Which retinal structure is primarily affected in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

The peripapillary outer retina and photoreceptor layer AIBSES is an idiopathic outer retinal disorder centred on the peripapillary photoreceptor layer, which is why the blind spot enlarges without true optic nerve disease.

The retinal nerve fibre layer over the disc

The prelaminar optic nerve head tissue

The inner nuclear layer at the macula

Acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES) is regarded as part of which disease spectrum?

The white dot syndromes, overlapping AZOOR and MEWDS AIBSES sits within the white dot syndrome spectrum and shares outer retinal features with acute zonal occult outer retinopathy and MEWDS.

The hereditary macular dystrophies

The pachychoroid disease spectrum

The demyelinating optic neuropathies

Which patient profile is most typical of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Elderly hypermetropic men with hypertension

Neonates with a positive family history

Children with a systemic autoimmune disease

Which OCT finding supports a diagnosis of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Peripapillary ellipsoid zone disruption with outer nuclear layer thinning OCT in AIBSES shows focal peripapillary ellipsoid zone disruption, outer nuclear layer thinning, and hyperreflective outer retinal change acutely.

Subretinal fluid extending under the fovea

Diffuse retinal nerve fibre layer swelling around the disc

Cystoid spaces within the inner nuclear layer

What is the characteristic fundus autofluorescence finding in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

A peripapillary hyperautofluorescent ring FAF typically shows a peripapillary hyperautofluorescent ring with patchy hyperautofluorescence over affected areas, reflecting RPE metabolic stress.

Complete absence of background autofluorescence

Confluent macular hypoautofluorescence

A stellate hypoautofluorescent pattern at the fovea

Which electrophysiology pattern is expected in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Normal full-field ERG with localised multifocal ERG dysfunction Full-field ERG is typically normal in AIBSES, while multifocal ERG shows dysfunction confined to the peripapillary region.

Extinguished scotopic and photopic full-field responses

An electronegative ERG with a reduced b-wave

Normal multifocal ERG with an abnormal electro-oculogram

Which findings would point to optic neuritis rather than acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Reduced acuity, pain on eye movement, and an afferent pupillary defect Optic neuritis causes reduced visual acuity, pain with eye movement and a relative afferent pupillary defect, none of which are features of AIBSES.

Photopsias with a temporal field defect

Peripapillary window defects on angiography

Subtle grey outer retinal changes beside the disc

Which feature separates multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) from acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

White dots with wreath-like angiographic findings MEWDS shows characteristic white dots and wreath-like angiographic patterns, which are typically absent in AIBSES.

Preserved central visual acuity

Peripapillary hyperautofluorescence on imaging

What is the primary management strategy for acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Observation with serial fields, OCT and symptom review There is no standardised treatment; observation is primary because the condition is usually self-limited, and steroid evidence is insufficient for routine use.

Immediate high-dose intravenous corticosteroids

Peripapillary laser photocoagulation

Long-term systemic immunosuppression

What is the typical visual outcome in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?

Preserved central acuity with a partly persistent blind spot Central acuity is generally preserved, but the enlarged blind spot often persists partially, improving gradually in some patients and remaining stable in others.

Progressive loss of central acuity over several months

Complete resolution of all field defects within weeks

Bilateral spread with legal blindness in most patients

Acute Idiopathic Blind Spot Enlargement Syndrome: A full study

Case Study

A 32-year-old myopic woman presented with a 10-day history of photopsias and a temporal visual field defect in her right eye.

She described shimmering lights and difficulty detecting objects temporally but denied pain or systemic symptoms. Visual acuity was 20/20 in both eyes.

Anterior segment examination was unremarkable, and there was no relative afferent pupillary defect.

Dilated fundus examination revealed subtle peripapillary outer retinal changes without obvious white dots or hemorrhage.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated focal disruption of the ellipsoid zone in the peripapillary region extending nasally from the fovea.

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) showed a peripapillary hyperautofluorescent ring. Visual field testing revealed a markedly enlarged blind spot in the right eye.

Full-field electroretinography (ERG) was normal, while multifocal ERG showed localized dysfunction corresponding to the affected region.

A diagnosis of Acute Idiopathic Blind Spot Enlargement Syndrome (AIBSES) was made. The patient was observed, and over three months, her photopsias diminished, although the blind spot enlargement partially persisted.

Disease Entity

Acute Idiopathic Blind Spot Enlargement Syndrome (AIBSES) is an uncommon, idiopathic outer retinal disorder characterized by the acute onset of photopsias and enlargement of the physiologic blind spot without significant optic nerve pathology.

It is considered part of the spectrum of white dot syndromes and has overlapping features with Acute Zonal Occult Outer Retinopathy (AZOOR) and Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome (MEWDS).

AIBSES primarily affects the peripapillary outer retina and photoreceptor layer, leading to functional deficits detectable on visual field testing.

Funduscopic findings may be subtle or even normal in early stages, making multimodal imaging crucial for diagnosis.

The condition is typically unilateral and self-limited, though persistent visual field defects are common.

Test your knowledge 10 questions from this article

Pathophysiology

The precise pathogenesis of AIBSES remains uncertain. Current evidence supports primary involvement of the outer retina, particularly the photoreceptor outer segments and ellipsoid zone, in the peripapillary region.

OCT studies demonstrate focal disruption of the ellipsoid zone and outer nuclear layer thinning, suggesting photoreceptor dysfunction or loss.

FAF often reveals hyperautofluorescence around the optic disc, indicating metabolic stress at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).

Although earlier theories suggested optic nerve involvement, normal visual acuity, absence of afferent pupillary defect, and preserved optic disc structure argue against primary optic neuropathy.

Instead, the blind spot enlargement appears secondary to peripapillary outer retinal dysfunction.

An inflammatory or post-viral immune-mediated mechanism has been proposed, given similarities to other white dot syndromes and occasional viral prodrome.

However, no specific infectious agent or autoimmune marker has been consistently identified.

AIBSES may represent a localized variant within the AZOOR complex, reflecting shared outer retinal pathology.

Epidemiology

AIBSES predominantly affects young to middle-aged adults, with a female predominance. Many patients are myopic.

The condition is rare, and precise incidence data are unavailable. Most reported cases are unilateral, although bilateral involvement has been described rarely.

There is no established racial predilection. Unlike some other inflammatory chorioretinal disorders, AIBSES has no strong association with systemic autoimmune disease.

Clinical Features

Patients with AIBSES typically present with an acute onset of photopsias and visual field abnormalities.

Common symptoms include:

Photopsias
Subjective scotoma adjacent to fixation
Difficulty detecting objects temporally
Enlarged blind spot

Visual acuity is usually preserved (20/20 or near normal), which may delay presentation or obscure the severity of the functional deficit.

Pain and systemic symptoms are typically absent. Some patients report a preceding viral-like illness.

The hallmark clinical feature is enlargement of the physiologic blind spot on automated perimetry.

Examination Findings

Anterior segment examination is usually normal.

Funduscopic findings may be subtle and include:

Mild peripapillary RPE changes
Subtle grayish outer retinal alterations
Occasionally minimal vitreous cells

The optic disc generally appears normal, without edema or pallor.

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Peripapillary ellipsoid zone disruption
Focal outer nuclear layer thinning
Hyperreflective outer retinal changes in the acute phase

Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF)

Peripapillary hyperautofluorescent ring
Patchy hyperautofluorescence corresponding to affected areas

Fluorescein Angiography (FA)

Mild peripapillary window defects
Minimal leakage, if any

Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA)

Hypofluorescent spots in the peripapillary region in some cases

Visual Field Testing

Markedly enlarged blind spot
Possible adjacent paracentral scotomas

Full-field ERG is typically normal, distinguishing AIBSES from more diffuse outer retinal disorders. Multifocal ERG demonstrates localized dysfunction corresponding to the peripapillary region.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis includes:

Papilledema
Optic neuritis
Peripapillary chorioretinitis
Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR)
Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS)
Early glaucoma with peripapillary defects

Papilledema must be excluded, particularly when blind spot enlargement is detected. However, AIBSES lacks optic disc edema and systemic signs of raised intracranial pressure.

Optic neuritis typically presents with decreased visual acuity, pain with eye movement, and afferent pupillary defect.

AZOOR may show more widespread outer retinal dysfunction and progressive zonal field loss.

MEWDS presents with characteristic white dots and wreath-like angiographic findings, which are typically absent in AIBSES.

Careful multimodal imaging and electrophysiology are essential to establish the diagnosis.

Diagnosis

AIBSES is a clinical diagnosis supported by imaging and functional testing.

Key diagnostic criteria include:

Acute onset of photopsias
Enlarged blind spot on perimetry
Preserved visual acuity
Peripapillary outer retinal changes on OCT/FAF
Normal or near-normal full-field ERG
Exclusion of optic nerve pathology

Neuroimaging is not routinely required unless optic nerve disease or intracranial pathology is suspected.

Systemic laboratory testing is generally unnecessary in typical cases.

Management

There is no standardized treatment for AIBSES.

Observation is the primary management strategy, as the condition is often self-limited.

Corticosteroids have been used empirically in some cases, but there is insufficient evidence to support routine use. Given the typically benign course, treatment risks must be weighed carefully.

Patients should be monitored with:

Serial visual field testing
OCT imaging
Symptom assessment

Follow-up is important to ensure stability and to exclude progression toward AZOOR spectrum disorders.

Prognosis

The prognosis of AIBSES is generally favorable in terms of central visual acuity, which usually remains preserved.

However, enlargement of the blind spot may persist partially or completely. Some patients experience gradual improvement over months, while others have stable residual field defects.

Recurrence is uncommon but has been reported.

Long-term progression to more extensive outer retinal disease is rare but warrants continued observation.

References

American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC): Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation. San Francisco, CA: AAO; latest edition.
American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course (BCSC): Retina and Vitreous. San Francisco, CA: AAO; latest edition.
Yanoff M, Duker JS. Ophthalmology. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2019.
Volpe NJ, Rizzo JF 3rd, Lessell S. Acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome: a review of 27 new cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(1):59–63.
Gass JDM. Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy and related disorders. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1993;91:608–665.
Monson DM, Smith JR. Acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(1):23–35.

Test yourself

A few questions straight from this article.

1 / 10 0 correct

Which retinal structure is primarily affected in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
AIBSES is an idiopathic outer retinal disorder centred on the peripapillary photoreceptor layer, which is why the blind spot enlarges without true optic nerve disease.
Acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES) is regarded as part of which disease spectrum?
AIBSES sits within the white dot syndrome spectrum and shares outer retinal features with acute zonal occult outer retinopathy and MEWDS.
Which patient profile is most typical of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
AIBSES predominantly affects young to middle-aged adults with a female predominance, and many affected patients are myopic.
Which OCT finding supports a diagnosis of acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
OCT in AIBSES shows focal peripapillary ellipsoid zone disruption, outer nuclear layer thinning, and hyperreflective outer retinal change acutely.
What is the characteristic fundus autofluorescence finding in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
FAF typically shows a peripapillary hyperautofluorescent ring with patchy hyperautofluorescence over affected areas, reflecting RPE metabolic stress.
Which electrophysiology pattern is expected in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
Full-field ERG is typically normal in AIBSES, while multifocal ERG shows dysfunction confined to the peripapillary region.
Which findings would point to optic neuritis rather than acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
Optic neuritis causes reduced visual acuity, pain with eye movement and a relative afferent pupillary defect, none of which are features of AIBSES.
Which feature separates multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) from acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
MEWDS shows characteristic white dots and wreath-like angiographic patterns, which are typically absent in AIBSES.
What is the primary management strategy for acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
There is no standardised treatment; observation is primary because the condition is usually self-limited, and steroid evidence is insufficient for routine use.
What is the typical visual outcome in acute idiopathic blind spot enlargement syndrome (AIBSES)?
Central acuity is generally preserved, but the enlarged blind spot often persists partially, improving gradually in some patients and remaining stable in others.